Picksights
Printers

Best home printer

Every other ranking on this site weights what you pay at the till. This one weights what you pay over five years, because in printers those are different numbers by a factor of five to ten — and the whole industry is built on you comparing the first one.

Updated 2026-07-292 min read

The short answer

Ignore the sticker price — it is the number that gets this decision wrong. Consumer Reports models a $128 cartridge inkjet at roughly $543 over five years once ink is counted, against about $5 a year for a refillable tank. The Epson EcoTank ET-4800 takes it here for the document feeder and Ethernet; the ET-2803 is the cheaper answer for a household. And if you never print in colour, buy the Brother mono laser instead — it is more reliable and it survives being ignored for months.

Picksights may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. This never affects which products we rank higher — our Picksights Score is calculated from published specs before any affiliate relationship is considered. See our ranking methodology below.

As an Amazon Associate, Picksights earns from qualifying purchases.

Interactive tool

What will each printer really cost you? Enter your own print volume →

Quick comparison

Ranked by Picksights Score. Prices are approximate and change frequently.
ProductPicksights ScoreFromBest for
#1 · Epson Epson EcoTank ET-48008.7/10$219.99Best for a home office
#2 · Epson Epson EcoTank ET-28038.4/10$179Best for most homes
#3 · Brother Brother HL-L2465DW8.2/10$169.99Best if you never print in colour

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

Top pick

Epson Epson EcoTank ET-4800

Epson

Number 1: Epson EcoTank ET-4800

PS8.7/10

Best for a home office

The one to buy if the printer has a job rather than a corner. The document feeder alone changes what you can do with it — scanning a stack instead of a page at a time — and it is the only machine here with Ethernet. It also costs the most up front, which is exactly the number you should be ignoring: on Consumer Reports' own modelling, a $128 cartridge printer overtakes this on total cost inside the first year and keeps going.

Pros

  • Bottled ink costs a fraction of cartridge ink per page — the whole argument for buying a tank printer
  • Automatic document feeder and Ethernet, which the cheaper tanks here leave out
  • Fax and copy included, so it replaces an office multifunction outright

Cons

  • The highest purchase price of the three, which is the number most shoppers compare
  • Photo output is competent rather than a reason to buy it
  • Tank printers need occasional use or the print head can clog

From $219.99Approximate — prices change

See current price(opens in a new tab)

Sources: Consumer Reports (laboratory testing and cost-of-ownership modelling) (2026-06-24) · TechRadar (standardised test across 200+ printers) (2026-07)Last checked by Picksights 2026-07-29

Epson Epson EcoTank ET-2803

Epson

Number 2: Epson EcoTank ET-2803

PS8.4/10

Best for most homes

The default recommendation for a house rather than an office. It does the three things households actually need — print, scan, copy — and it does them with the ink economics that make tank printers worth the higher sticker. You give up the document feeder, which matters only if you regularly scan stacks of paper. If you do, spend the extra $40; if you do not, this is the one.

Pros

  • Around two years of ink in the box, so the first refill is a long way off
  • The cheapest genuine tank printer here, and the running-cost advantage is identical to the pricier model
  • Simple enough that it is the sensible default for a household

Cons

  • No document feeder — scanning multiple pages means feeding them one at a time
  • No fax or Ethernet
  • Colour output is adequate rather than good

From $179Approximate — prices change

See current price(opens in a new tab)

Sources: RTINGS printer testing (2026) · TechRadar (standardised test across 200+ printers) (2026-07)Last checked by Picksights 2026-07-29

Brother Brother HL-L2465DW

Brother

Number 3: Brother HL-L2465DW

PS8.2/10

Best if you never print in colour

The honest answer for a large number of people who buy colour printers and never print in colour. Consumer Reports' position is blunt: if you do not need colour, buy a mono laser, because they are far more reliable. And the reason matters — toner does not dry out, so this survives being ignored for three months, which is exactly what kills an inkjet. Print one photo a year at a shop and you will still be ahead.

Pros

  • Consumer Reports' testing finds lasers markedly more reliable than inkjets, which is the complaint most printer owners actually have
  • Toner does not dry out, so it survives months of not being used — the failure mode that kills inkjets
  • Crisp text at speed, with automatic two-sided printing

Cons

  • No colour whatsoever, which rules it out for anyone printing photos or school projects
  • Per-page cost is higher than bottled tank ink, though far below cartridges
  • No fax or document feeder

From $169.99Approximate — prices change

Sources: Consumer Reports (laboratory testing and cost-of-ownership modelling) (2026-06-24) · TechRadar (standardised test across 200+ printers) (2026-07)Last checked by Picksights 2026-07-29

How we rank

Picksights methodology

Every other ranking on this site weights what you pay at the till. This one weights what you pay over five years, because in printers those are different numbers by a factor of five to ten — and the whole industry is built on you comparing the first one.

Running cost

35% of score

Print quality

25% of score

Price

25% of score

Features

15% of score

Frequently asked questions

Why is sticker price such a poor guide?

Because the cartridge-inkjet business model is to sell the machine cheap and make the margin back on ink. Consumer Reports models a $128 cartridge printer at roughly $543 over five years once ink is counted, against about $5 a year for a refillable tank printer — the purchase-price gap is small next to that difference.

Is a tank printer always cheaper?

For general use, yes, with one exception: if you almost never print in color, a mono laser like the Brother HL-L2465DW has a higher per-page cost than tank ink, but it's more reliable long-term — toner doesn't dry out, so it survives months of not being used, exactly the failure mode that kills inkjets.

Do I need an automatic document feeder (ADF)?

Only if you regularly scan stacks of paper. The Epson EcoTank ET-4800 includes one alongside fax and Ethernet; the cheaper ET-2803 doesn't — scanning multiple pages means feeding them one at a time. For an ordinary household without office-style needs, that gap rarely matters.

How much ink comes included with a new tank printer?

It varies by model. The Epson EcoTank ET-2803 includes roughly two years' worth of ink in the box per the manufacturer, so the first refill is a long way off. Always check the manufacturer's own figure for your specific model rather than assuming a generic number.

When does a laser printer make more sense than an inkjet?

When you don't need color and reliability matters most. Consumer Reports is blunt on this point: lasers are markedly more reliable than inkjets, and toner doesn't degrade over time the way liquid ink can in a printer you use infrequently.

What this ranking does not cover yet

Three printers from two manufacturers, and no photo-focused model. Colour laser and dedicated photo printers are genuinely different decisions and we would rather add them properly than stretch this ranking to cover intents it was not built for.

Related guides and comparisons

Also worth a look